Tulsa at Rice
Kickoff 10/17/2026, 3:30:00 PM CDT · Rice Stadium
American Athletic / American Athletic · Week 7
Article published 10/13/2026, 12:09:33 PM CDT · last material update 10/13/2026, 12:09:33 PM CDT
Tulsa
21.1PROJECTION
Rice
28.0Model projections are estimates. Forecast timestamp 10/11/2026, 2:14:44 PM CDT · feature-data cutoff 10/11/2026, 2:14:44 PM CDT. Verified stored season-to-date statistics; descriptive comparisons are separate from the original scoring-model feature window. Comparison snapshot 10/13/2026, 12:09:33 PM CDT.
Official betting selection
Awaiting Odds
The model projection is available, but no eligible verified sportsbook offer has produced a locked official selection.
Team statistics & league rankings
Season-to-date comparison · ranks use covered teams within College Football · #1 is best for each metric.
| Metric | Tulsa | Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 27.5#79 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 17.0#127 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Points allowed / game | 23.3#67 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 27.5#100 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Total yards / game | 357.8#98 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 313.2#122 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Yards allowed / game | 418.0#126 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 367.3#85 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Passing yards / game | 197.0#97 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 81.5#137 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Rushing yards / game | 160.8#65 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 231.7#11 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Yards / play | 5.38#109 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 5.00#120 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Yards allowed / play | 5.45#72 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 5.50#78 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Third-down conversion | 28.4%#131 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 29.5%#129 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Third-down conversion allowed | 41.8%#104 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 41.7%#103 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Turnovers / game | 0.67#23 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 1.50#92 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Takeaways / game | 2.33#3 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 0.67#118 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Offensive EPA / play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| EPA allowed / play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Offensive success rate | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Success rate allowed | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Red-zone scoring rate | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Turnover differential / game | 1.67#4 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | -0.83#127 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Defensive sacks / game | 2.33#41 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 1.50#102 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Tackles for loss / game | 4.67#94 of 138 covered teams · 6 games | 6.00#42 of 138 covered teams · 6 games |
| Passing EPA / pass play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Rushing EPA / rush play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Explosive-play rate | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Sacks suffered / pass play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| QB hits / pass play | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Adjusted strength of schedule | Unavailable | Unavailable |
Statistical matchup analysis
Tulsa has the higher observed scoring average: Tulsa scores 27.5 points per game and Rice scores 17.0, a 10.5-point difference. These are unadjusted season averages, not an estimate of this game's winning margin.
Tulsa allows 23.3 points per game, compared with 27.5 for Rice. Tulsa has the stronger defensive scoring figure by 4.2 points per game. Opponent quality and game situations can affect this comparison; a better raw rank is not proof of a better adjusted defense.
Tulsa's offense produces 357.8 yards per game; Rice's defense has conceded 367.3. The 9.5-yard difference compares two observed averages rather than predicting a yardage total. Tulsa averages 5.38 yards per play, which puts it #109 among 138 covered teams.
Rice's offense produces 313.2 yards per game; Tulsa's defense has conceded 418.0. The 104.8-yard difference compares two observed averages rather than predicting a yardage total. Rice averages 5.00 yards per play, which puts it #120 among 138 covered teams.
Turnover differential / game is another measurable difference: Tulsa records 1.67, while Rice records -0.83. Higher is better for this metric. Compare the sample counts in the table before treating a difference as stable.
Third-down conversion is another measurable difference: Tulsa records 28.4%, while Rice records 29.5%. Higher is better for this metric. Compare the sample counts in the table before treating a difference as stable.
The stored production forecast is Tulsa 21.1, Rice 28.0. Rice is projected to win by 6.9 points. SE v3.0 uses recent team and opponent profiles rather than just the full-season averages shown here. The college football model includes home/away context; an independently attributable home-field point adjustment is not exposed for this game, so none is claimed.
Saved sportsbook observations
Spread unavailable
Total unavailable
Observed Not verified. Saved market observations can differ from the original locked betting line.
Final model assessment
Rice is the projected winner in the original stored scoring forecast, with a 6.9-point margin and 49.1 combined points. The comparisons above describe the scoring, defensive and efficiency context for this matchup. The official selection, when published, remains the specific wager in the tracker.
Explore this matchup
Game previews · Spreadsheet entry · Tracked betting record · Tulsa statistics · Rice statistics · American Athletic previews
Related team matchups
Definitions, coverage & original timestamps
Game ID college-football:401862805. Article creation is not the original prediction timestamp. Original forecast 10/11/2026, 2:14:44 PM CDT; final stored pregame forecast 10/11/2026, 2:14:44 PM CDT. Rates use summed observed numerators and denominators; game averages use games with that statistic. Rankings use competition ties within the covered league population. NFL data uses regular-season games. EPA / play uses observed PBP EPA counts; success means positive EPA. Explosive plays use the source aggregation’s 20-yard passing / 10-yard rushing thresholds. CFB red-zone scoring includes field goals and touchdowns; a different NFL red-zone rate is not substituted. Quarterback hit rate is a hit proxy, not a complete pressure rate. Missing adjusted strength of schedule, pressure rates or archived inputs remain unavailable.